section 4 — target customer & market

National planning ministries with a legally mandated periodic review.

The buying unit is typically the planning ministry's M&E or digital transformation directorate. Funding in year one is more often a multilateral or bilateral donor grant than the ministry's own discretionary budget.

LayerDefinitionEstimate
TAMCountries with a formal national development plan~134 countries
SAMSubset with RPJMN-equivalent multi-tier structure and a mandated mid-term review35–45 countriesworking estimate — needs primary validation
SOM (3-yr)Reachable via Indonesia case study + multilateral procurement channel3–6 government contractsworking estimate — needs primary validation

Flag: SAM and SOM are working estimates, not validated figures. Before this is used externally, build an actual candidate-country list — planning structure, digital-government budget line, no existing incumbent vendor — rather than citing a round number.

section 6 — competitive landscape

No credible pitch pretends this space is empty.

Three categories of alternative exist, and the honest positioning against each is different.

Manual consulting

McKinsey / BCG / Deloitte public-sector practices already doing parts of this analysis manually

why PETA-AI is different

Consulting is a one-off, expensive, non-continuous engagement. PETA-AI is a standing system that re-checks coherence every time a new document is published, at a fraction of the cost of repeat engagements.

Generic AI/RAG vendors

Any team standing up an LLM + vector database over the same government documents

why PETA-AI is different

Can replicate Layers 1–3 in months. Cannot replicate Layer 4 without the historical outcomes dataset and the calibration discipline — that data asset is the barrier to entry, not the code.

Government digital-platform incumbents

KRISNA, One Data Indonesia and similar centralised platforms already contracted to Bappenas

why PETA-AI is different

Data-aggregation platforms, not reasoning systems — structurally unable to do program-goal-level anomaly detection. PETA-AI sits on top of this infrastructure rather than replacing it, which lowers the political barrier to adoption.

Still needed before this goes in front of an investor: a direct check for whether any startup, anywhere, already sells AI-based policy coherence detection to a national government. If one exists, name it and state the differentiation directly.